A week of random thoughts

My blog tonight is a hodge podge of random thoughts.  Last night I missed my usual blog session because I was at a buttoned-down affair for some members of the local community.  I met people from all over the world.  We do similar types of work and spent the evening talking about our countries, backgrounds, and what we do.  I really enjoyed it.  I don’t have an opportunity to go to these types of events very often, so I made the most of it.  This week at work I received several emergency calls at various times of the day.  There’s nothing like being startled out of a deep sleep at 1:30 a.m. to answer an important call.  I also started my new job assisting Americans in Korea.  My new assignment is very different from the type of work I was doing just last week.  For example, this job will entail much more travel.  Yesterday I visited some Americans in Seoul, and next week I will head to Daegu to visit more Americans.  So far, I’m really enjoying the change of pace, although the level of responsibility I’ve taken on now has multiplied exponentially.  The past few days have left me busier than I would like.  Now that I’ve transitioned to a new assignment, I’ve been heading home later than usual and have less time to enjoy a quiet evening at home. 

I spent some time tonight watching my son play with other children while I talked to their dads.  That’s a nice change of pace.  My son’s mom often takes him out to play with other children; by evening there are far fewer opportunities for me to take my son out to play.  Between dinner and bedtime, there’s not much time in the evening.  At first we were going to take him to the store, but I didn’t feel like shopping and chasing him around the store.  Then we decided to take him for an ice cream cone, but he changed our minds after he started playing in the neighbor’s children’s sandbox.  He loves playing in the sand with all sorts of toys such as bulldozers and dump trucks.  I enjoyed watching his young, creative mind at work as he guided the toys around the sandbox.  I’m really glad that another three-day weekend is coming tomorrow so I can spend more time at home.  This weekend is Korean Memorial Day, time for the masses to head out and enjoy a well-earned day off.  My wife and I have been planning some family trips we would like to take during the long weekend.

Did I make a mistake selling Google too early?  I jumped off the bandwagon at $200/share.  Just six weeks ago the stock price was hovering around $200/share, and then all of a sudden the entire investment community decided the stock price would rise to $300-$350/share because it will likely be added to the S&P 500 index.  After I liquidated my shares, the stock briefly dipped to $165/share before recovering.  I thought about buying it again, but I did not want to take the risk that Google would head in the other direction.  That’s what happened with DreamWorks Animation, which dropped like a rock after it failed to meet quarterly expectations and its newest release, “Madagascar,” performed poorly at the box office.  I sold early and avoided losses with that stock.  At $284/share I can still buy Google with plenty of upside, but the price is too steep for me.  Still, it makes me proud to know that I got in on Google at the beginning when few in the investment community had faith it would fly.  Zig when they zag, I say.  My other IPO investment, Morningstar, is also doing well.  It is now hovering at $23.19, a 26% gain.  Not bad for one month’s investment.  It was the third best performing IPO in May.  I just received notice from W.R. Hambrecht that I can invest in the upcoming HemoSense IPO.  I have some cash left over I didn’t invest when I bought Morningstar.  Should I try my hand a third time through Dutch auction IPO?  I really don’t know yet.  I’ll think about it.  I don’t know anything about HemoSense, and they say you should buy what you know.  I should probably be patient and wait for another Dutch auction IPO.  Impatience is not a virtue.

Note to renshai_colby:  Hi, thanks for stopping by to read my blog and post a comment.  I always like to respond to comments when I get a chance.  You asked how we keep our travels from turning into disasters.  Well, sometimes they take a turn for the worse!  During our trip to Egypt, our hotel room was robbed, and we lost quite a bit of money.  The bus we took to Sinai had a flat tire, and we almost missed our connection to Jordan.  The day after we returned home from Egypt, our car was totaled less than a mile from home.  Our trip to Seoul was trying because we were all really sick (see the archives from February 2005).  Traveling can be very trying.  It’s easy to get nostalgic when you look back on those trials and tribulations.  I also have to admit that I sometimes when I write this blog I gloss over events that happen in our lives, especially if the press is negative.  I try to dwell on the positive and yet keep this blog as realistic as I can. 

You also asked whether Korean food is salty.  Yes, it can be pretty salty.  Asians, including Koreans, tend to use MSG (monosodium glutamate) in order to spice up dishes.  One unfortunate side effect of MSG is that it tends to make one’s mouth really dry after eating it.  Have you ever eaten Chinese food in the U.S. and found that it’s left you very thirsty?  That affect is caused by MSG.  Many people avoid MSG when eating Asian foods, and you’ll find that some restaurants put up signs saying "No MSG" to advertise that they don’t use MSG in their food.  Korean food is spicy as well.  It’s a sharp, quick spicy tasty that fades quickly.  It’s a type of spiciness different from what you find with Mexican, Thai, or Cantonese cuisine.  I think it’s because Koreans tend to use red chilis exclusively in their cuisine, whereas other ethnic foods use a wider variety of hot spices.  I prefer the quick, sharp kick of Korean food over other spicy ethnic foods.

Compromise isn't dead

I usually avoid talking about politics on this blog.  It’s hard to do because I am actually a political junky.  I have a love-hate relationship with politics.  I find it absolutely fascinating, but sometimes it drives me nuts.  I try not to make this blog overtly political, because World Adventurer’s focus has always been on cultural experiences and on whatever tickles my fancy on any given day.  I’m glad to have blog readers from all sorts of political persuasions.  I try not to impose my own political views.  Of course, I occasionally slip up and write something that gives away my own political views, but it’s usually unintentional. 

The news today from Capitol Hill is definitely worth writing about.  U.S. Senate Democrats and Republicans crafted a compromise agreement designed to avoid what is now called "the nuclear option" over President Bush’ judicial nominees.  Some Democrats have been threatening to filibuster over some of the president’s judicial nominees, and some Republicans have threatened to change Senate rules so that filibustering cannot be used to hold up votes confirming judicial nominees.  Republicans currently do not have enough votes to end filibusters (60 votes), but they have enough votes to change Senate rules to eliminate filibusters (55 votes).  The compromise agreement allows some judicial nominees to come up for a vote, while some nominees will still be subject to filibuster.  Filibuster rules will also remain unchanged.

Filibustering is a tactic used by the minority party (currently the Democrats) to prevent a vote over a contentious issue.  Because the majority party (the Republicans) can approve a resolution by a majority vote, the minority party infrequently use filibusters to prevent a resolution from coming to a vote.  As long as debate over an issue continues, a vote cannot be called.  Over the years, filibusters have been used by both Democrats and Republicans with mixed success.  It’s a battle of wills, and whichever party blinks first wins the battle.  Because filibusters often last for days, they sometimes lead to tragi-comic moments.  Who can forget (if you were alive in 1957) when Strom Thurmond spoke for an unprecedented 24 hours?  Or watching a Senator read from a phone book during a filibuster?  A filibuster is a tactic of last resort.  It has been used for noble and infamous ends (depending on your political persuasion).  Some civil rights legislation was held up by filibuster, as will some judicial nominees.  Filibustering is ultimately a political tactic; in and of it is neither good nor bad.

I am happy about this compromise agreement for two reasons.  One, the two parties came to an acceptable compromise.  7 Republicans and 7 Democrats put aside their political differences and compromised on a key issue.  "Compromise" is now a dirty word in political circles, but promoting bipartisanship is essential to a functioning democracy.  Both parties need to work together.  Neither side is completely happy with this compromise, but they agree that it is preferrable to resorting to escalation by voting for a "nuclear option."  Secondly, an important aspect of our democracy remains intact.  For better or for worse, filibustering is an important part of the U.S. political process.  The minority party needs to use it with discretion, and the majority party should not undermine it.  Republicans and Democrats alike need to remember that at some point in the future their status as minority or majority party will change, and they need to respond based on the principle of the "Golden Rule."  In the future, the Republicans will attempt to filibuster on some unforeseen issue, and the Democrats should not undermine this by changing the rules to prohibit filibusters.  Filibusters help keep our democracy vibrant and should remain intact, albeit used sparingly.

Talent Show caps a long week

Tonight I performed two songs at our community Talent Show.  I performed a solo version of the Roy Orbison classic, “Oh Pretty Woman” and a duet of “Endless Love” by Lionel Ritchie and Diana Ross.  We did very well.  In fact, everyone who performed did a fabulous job.  My partner on “Endless Love” also performed a solo of a French song (she hails from Belgium and is fluent in French).  We made a couple mistakes during our rendition, but we got the crowd into our duet and had a lot of fun.  Preparing for two three-minute songs was a lot of work.  We practiced a couple of times together and worked out singing logistics.  We used a large karaoke machine and sang along to instrumental versions of the songs.  We didn’t win the competition, but I’m sure it was a crowd pleaser.  I’m so tired now that I will retire early tonight after I finish writing my blog. 

 

All in all, it’s been a long, long week.  It ended with the Talent Show.  It also included a presentation at Chung-Ahn University in Seoul and an important meeting with my section chief.  I put together a pitch to sell my chief on the idea of implementing a quality management system (QMS) and achieving ISO 9001 certification for our section.  Although it’s an office, it still functions much like what I affectionately call “a white-collar factory.”  The principles of operations management used in manufacturing can be modified and implemented in an office setting.  My chief agreed, and he gave me the green light to start working on implementing a QMS and pursuing ISO 9001 certification.  It will be a huge undertaking.  My goal is to achieve certification before I leave Seoul in 2007.  Implementing a certified QMS requires a lot of documentation, employee cooperation, and support from management.  The task will be daunting, but I think it’s achievable within two years.

 

CNN reported today that three members of a family in the area where I grew up were brutally murdered, and two children from the same family were abducted by an unknown assailant.  Coeur d’Alene, Idaho is usually a quiet, unassuming place.  This murder must be an extreme shock to local residents.  When I grew up there, I never heard of murders in our area.  Murders always happened in the big metropolis of Spokane, Washington (population 175,000).  It’s such a sad, sad story.  I’m so sorry to hear what happened and hope that police find the murderer and the abducted children before anything happens to them.  I have no idea why anyone would do such a thing.  My parents still live in the area, so this story hits close to home for me.

 

I often hear from many Americans about how dangerous it is living and traveling overseas.  For example, when I lived in Austria as a youth I wanted to visit nearby Zagreb, Croatia.  The Bosnian conflict had recently ended, and my family insisted that I forgo the trip because they thought that visiting Zagreb was “too dangerous.”  Perhaps, but sometimes perceptions do not match reality.  I respected their wishes and regretfully aborted the trip.  Danger is not limited to urban or war torn areas.  I feel much safer here in Seoul than I did living in the Washington, D.C. area, even though Seoul is more than twice as large as D.C.  I even feel safer here than I did in Seattle, which is a fairly safe American city.  I think statistics meted out my contention that sometimes living outside the U.S. is safer than living in America.  Coeur d’Alene used to feel safe, a place where you did not even have to lock your door.  Now my idyllic hometown has been shattered by a brutal murder and abduction splashed across headlines throughout the country.  It goes to show that danger can happen anywhere, at any time.  I think it’s best to live life with that thought in the back of one’s mind without letting phobia control of your decision making.  In 2001, immediately following 9/11 and before the Afghan War, my wife and I toured the Middle East on tour.  We seriously considered aborting the trip.  I am so glad we decided to go anyway despite tensions in the Middle East.  We met just four Americans during our journeys there.  Tourism was so depressed at the time that we felt like we had the entire place to ourselves.  I am so glad that at that time I did not let caution thwart our trip.  Live life to the fullest, I say.